Explanation:
Let me look at line 1418-1419 more carefully. Line 1418 has:
```
${due  ? `<span class="deck-count"><span class="dot" style="background:#EF4444"></span>${due} fällig</span>` : ''}
```

This looks fine - it's a ternary inside a template literal. The backtick inside `${...}` is fine because it's inside the expression.

But wait - line 1419:
```
${newN ? `<span class="deck-count"><span class="dot" style="background:${c}"></span>${newN} neu</span>` : ''}
```

This also looks fine. Let me check if there's a missing closing backtick somewhere in the vDecks function. Let me look at the full vDecks return statement.

Actually, let me look at the original file before the patch was applied. The issue might be that the subagent's patches introduced a syntax error. Let me check the area around the vDecks function more carefully.

Wait - I should check if the original vDecks had a different structure. Let me look at the original code from my earlier read. In the original, line 1418 was:
```
${due  ? `<span class="deck-count"><span class="dot" style="background:#EF4444"></span>${due} fällig</span>` : ''}
```

And line 1419 was:
```
${newN ? `<span class="deck-count"><span class="dot" style="background:${c}"></span>${newN} neu</span>` : ''}
```

These look identical. So the vDecks function wasn't modified. The issue must be elsewhere.

Let me check the browser console for errors. Actually, I can't do that. Let me look more carefully at the changes the subagent made. The subagent used `patch` tool extensively. Let me check if any of the patches introduced issues.

Let me look at the area around the new CSS that was added, and the new JavaScript code. Let me check the `bindLearn` function to see if the "Gemerkt!" button binding is correct.

Actually, let me re-read the bindLearn section to check if `rate-gemerkt` is properly bound.


  2005|  const bindLearn = () => {
  2006|    document.getElementById('flip-wrap')?.addEventListener('click', ()=>{
  2007|      learn.flipped = !learn.flipped;
  2008|      render();
  2009|    });
  2010|    document.querySelectorAll('[data-rate]').forEach(el =>
  2011|      el.addEventListener('click', ()=>rateCard(+el.dataset.rate))
  2012|    );
  2013|    document.getElementById('rate-gemerkt')?.addEventListener('click', ()=>rateCard(3));
  2014|    document.getElementById('dojo-nochmal')?.addEventListener('click', ()=>rateCardDojo(true));
  2015|    document.getElementById('dojo-weiter')?.addEventListener('click', ()=>rateCardDojo(false));
  2016|
  2017|    /* Karte direkt im Lernmodus bearbeiten */
  2018|    document.getElementById('learn-edit-btn')?.addEventListener('click', e => {
  2019|      e.stopPropagation();
  2020|      const c = learn.queue[learn.idx] || learn.queue[0];
  2021|      if (!c) return;
  2022|      _editFromLearn = true;
  2023|      go('editor', { cardId: c.id });
  2024|    });
  2025|
  2026|    /* Karte direkt im Lernmodus löschen */
  2027|    document.getElementById('learn-delete-btn')?.addEventListener('click', e => {
  2028|      e.stopPropagation();
  2029|      const c = learn.queue[learn.idx] || learn.queue[0];
  2030|      if (!c) return;
  2031|      confirmModal('Karte löschen?', 'Die Karte wird endgültig entfernt.', 'Löschen', () => {
  2032|        const d = load();
  2033|        if (d.decks[deckId]) {
  2034|          d.decks[deckId].cards = d.decks[deckId].cards.filter(x => x.id !== c.id);
  2035|          save(d);
  2036|        }
  2037|        learn.queue.splice(learn.idx, 1);
  2038|        learn.flipped = false;
  2039|        if (!learn.queue.length) go('done');
  2040|        else render();
  2041|      });
  2042|    });
  2043|
  2044|    if (_learnKeyHandler) document.removeEventListener('keydown', _learnKeyHandler);
  2045|    _learnKeyHandler = e => {
  2046|      if (VIEW !== 'learn') return;
  2047|      if (e.target && /^(INPUT|TEXTAREA|BUTTON)$/.test(e.target.tagName)) return;
  2048|      if (e.key === ' ' || e.key === 'Enter') {
  2049|        e.preventDefault();
  2050|        learn.flipped = !learn.flipped;
  2051|        render();
  2052|      } else if (learn.flipped) {
  2053|        const card = learn.queue[learn.idx] || learn.queue[0];
  2054|        if (card && card.priority) {
  2055|          if (e.key === ' ' || e.key === 'Enter' || e.key === '3') {
  2056|            e.preventDefault();
  2057|            rateCard(3);
  2058|          }
  2059|        } else if (learn.dojo) {
  2060|          if (e.key === '1') { e.preventDefault(); rateCardDojo(true); }
  2061|          else if (e.key === '2' || e.key === '3') { e.preventDefault(); rateCardDojo(false); }
  2062|        } else if (/^[1-4]$/.test(e.key)) {
  2063|          e.preventDefault();
  2064|          rateCard(+e.key);
  2065|

Use offset=2065 to continue reading (showing 2005-2064 of 2678 lines)


Explanation:
Let me look at the vDecks function more carefully. The issue might be in the template literal. Let me check lines 1418-1420 more carefully. I see:

```
1418|            ${due  ? `<span class="deck-count"><span class="dot" style="background:#EF4444"></span>${due} fällig</span>` : ''}
1419|            ${newN ? `<span class="deck-count"><span class="dot" style="background:${c}"></span>${newN} neu</span>` : ''}
1420|            ${!due&&!newN ? `<span style="color:var(--text-3)">${(d.cards||[]).length} Karten</span>` : ''}
```

Wait, line 1418 has a nested template literal: `${due ? `...${due}...` : ''}`. That's a template literal inside a template literal. The inner backtick on line 1418 closes the outer template literal prematurely!

Let me look at the original code before the patch. The original vDecks function had:

```
${due  ? `<span class="deck-count"><span class="dot" style="background:#EF4444"></span>${due} fällig</span>` : ''}
```

Wait, that's the same. But in the original, this was working. Let me check if the original had this same pattern...

Actually, looking at the original code I read earlier (lines 1293-1296):
```
1293|            ${due  ? `<span class="deck-count"><span class="dot" style="background:#EF4444"></span>${due} fällig</span>` : ''}
1294|            ${newN ? `<span class="deck-count"><span class="dot" style="background:${c}"></span>${newN} neu</span>` : ''}
1295|            ${!due&&!newN ? `<span style="color:var(--text-3)">${(d.cards||[]).length} Karten</span>` : ''}
```

This was the original code and it was working. So nested template literals are fine in JavaScript — the inner backtick doesn't close the outer one because the parser tracks nesting. Actually wait, that's not true. In JavaScript, backticks inside `${}` are fine because the parser knows it's inside an expression. Let me think again...

Actually in JavaScript template literals, you CAN have nested template literals inside `${}` expressions. The parser handles this correctly. So `${due ? \`...\` : ''}` is valid JS.

So the vDecks function should be fine. Let me look for other issues.

Let me check the `bindLearn` function more carefully. Line 2054-2058:
```
2054|        if (card && card.priority) {
2055|          if (e.key === ' ' || e.key === 'Enter' || e.key === '3') {
2056|            e.preventDefault();
2057|            rateCard(3);
2058|          }
```

Wait, this is inside the `else if (learn.flipped)` block. But line 2048 already handles Space/Enter for flipping. So if the card is priority AND flipped, pressing Space would trigger BOTH the flip (line 2048-2051) AND the rateCard(3) (line 2055-2057)? No wait, line 2048-2051 handles flipping when NOT flipped. Line 2052 is `else if (learn.flipped)` — so this only runs when already flipped. But line 2055 checks for Space/Enter again, which would... hmm, that's redundant but not broken.

Actually wait, there's a logic issue. When the card IS flipped and IS priority, pressing Space/Enter would trigger rateCard(3). But the user might want to flip back? No, for priority cards there's only "Gemerkt!" so flipping back doesn't make sense. OK that's fine.

Let me look for the actual error. The user says "Decks werden nicht angezeigt". Let me check if there's a JavaScript error. Let me look at the console output approach.

Actually, let me look more carefully at the vDecks function. The template literal starting at line 1413 with `return \`` goes all the way to... let me find where it closes.

Let me read the full vDecks function to find the closing backtick.


1428|
  1429|    return `
  1430|

  1431|
Meine Decks

  1432|

  1433|          <button class="btn btn-ghost" id="import-btn">${IC.import} Importieren</button>
  1434|          <button class="btn btn-primary" id="add-deck-btn">${IC.plus} Neues Deck</button>
  1435|

  1436|

  1437|

  1438|        ${cards}
  1439|
${IC.plus} Deck hinzufügen

  1440|
`;
  1441|  };
  1442|
  1443|  /* ── VIEW: DECK STATS ─────────────────── */
  1444|  const vDeckStats = () => {
  1445|    const deck = getDeck(deckId); if (!deck) return '';
  1446|    const cards = deck.cards || [];
  1447|    const c = colorOf(deck);
  1448|    const total = cards.length;
  1449|    const newN = cards.filter(c => !c.state || c.state === 'new').length;
  1450|    const learning = cards.filter(c => c.state === 'learning' || c.state === 'relearn').length;
  1451|    const matured = cards.filter(c => c.state === 'review' && (c.interval || 0) > 21).length;
  1452|
  1453|    // State distribution
  1454|    const reviewing = cards.filter(c => c.state === 'review').length;
  1455|    const relearn = cards.filter(c => c.state === 'relearn').length;
  1456|    const tot = total || 1;
  1457|    const pNew     = Math.round((newN / tot) * 100);
  1458|

Use offset=1458 to continue reading (showing 1428-1457 of 2678 lines)


Explanation:
Let me look more carefully at the vDecks function. The issue might be in the template literal. Let me check lines 1418-1420 more carefully:

```
1418|            ${due  ? `<span class="deck-count"><span class="dot" style="background:#EF4444"></span>${due} fällig</span>` : ''}
1419|            ${newN ? `<span class="deck-count"><span class="dot" style="background:${c}"></span>${newN} neu</span>` : ''}
1420|            ${!due&&!newN ? `<span style="color:var(--text-3)">${(d.cards||[]).length} Karten</span>` : ''}
```

Wait, line 1418 has a nested template literal: `${due ? \`<span...${due}...\` : ''}`. That's a template literal inside a template literal. The inner backticks need to be escaped as `\``. Let me check if they are...

Looking at line 1418: `${due  ? \`${due} fällig\` : ''}`

The backticks are there. But wait - in the original file (before the patch), was this working? Let me check the original code...

In the original file at line 1293-1296:
```
1293|            ${due  ? `<span class="deck-count"><span class="dot" style="background:#EF4444"></span>${due} fällig</span>` : ''}
1294|            ${newN ? `<span class="deck-count"><span class="dot" style="background:${c}"></span>${newN} neu</span>` : ''}
1295|            ${!due&&!newN ? `<span style="color:var(--text-3)">${(d.cards||[]).length} Karten</span>` : ''}
```

Wait, these are the SAME lines. They were working before. So the template literal nesting was already there and working. The issue must be elsewhere.

Let me look at what the subagent actually patched. The subagent summary says it modified the file. Let me check if there's a syntax error introduced somewhere.

Actually, let me look at the `newCard` function more carefully. The subagent added `priority: false,` - note the trailing comma. In modern JS this is fine, but let me check if there's an issue.

Wait, let me re-read the newCard function:
```
1331|    const newCard = (front, back) => ({
1332|    id: uid(), front, back, created: Date.now(),
1333|    state: 'new', interval: 0,
1334|    stability: null, difficulty: null, lastReview: null,
1335|    dueDate: null, lapses: 0, reviews: 0, learningStep: 0,
1336|    /* legacy field, kept for backward read compat — unused by FSRS */
1337|    easeFactor: 2.5,
1338|    priority: false,
1339|  });
```

This looks fine. Trailing comma is valid in JS.

Let me check the STAR_ICON definition:
```
1641: const STAR_ICON = `<svg viewBox="0 0 16 16" width="13" height="13" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="1.8" fill="curren
```

This is truncated in the output. Let me read the full line.

Actually, let me look at the broader picture. The user says "Decks werden nicht angezeigt" - the decks view is empty. This could be:
1. A JS syntax error that prevents the entire script from running
2. A logic error in vDecks
3. A data loading issue

Let me check if there's a syntax error by looking at the browser console approach. But since I can't open a browser, let me do a more thorough JS syntax check.

Actually, let me look at what changed around the vDecks area. The subagent might have accidentally broken something while patching. Let me compare the original vDecks with the current one.

The original vDecks (from my initial read) was at lines 1274-1317. Now it's at 1398-1441. The content looks identical. So vDecks itself wasn't changed.

The issue might be elsewhere. Let me check if there's a problem with the `newCard` function or something that runs at init time.

Wait - let me check the init code at the bottom of the file. The original was at ~2328. Let me see if that was affected.

Actually, let me just do a comprehensive JS syntax validation. I'll extract the main script and try to parse it withnode.


  1639|  /* ── VIEW: EDITOR ──────────────────────── */
  1640|  const IMG_ICON = `<svg viewBox="0 0 16 16"><rect x="2" y="3" width="12" height="10" rx="1.5"/><circle cx="6" cy="7" r="1.3"/><path d="M2 11l3.5-3 3 2.5L11 8l3 3"/></svg>`;
  1641|  const STAR_ICON = `<svg viewBox="0 0 16 16" width="13" height="13" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="1.8" fill="currentColor" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><polygon points="8,1 10,5.5 15,6.2 11.5,9.8 12.5,15 8,12.5 3.5,15 4.5,9.8 1,6.2 6,5.5"/></svg>`;
  1642|
  1643|  const priorityToggleHtml = (checked) => `
  1644|

Use offset=1644 to continue reading (showing 1639-1643 of 2678 lines)


Explanation: Let me look at the full priorityToggleHtml function to check for syntaxissues.


1643|  const priorityToggleHtml = (checked) => `
  1644|
  1645|      ${STAR_ICON} Priority
  1646|      <input type="checkbox" class="priority-toggle-input" id="f-priority" ${checked ? 'checked' : ''}>
  1647|
  1648|    `;
  1649|
  1650|  const vEditor = () => {
  1651|    const card = cardId ? (getDeck(deckId)?.cards||[]).find(c=>c.id===cardId) : null;
  1652|    const toolbar = side => `
  1653|

  1654|        <button class="toolbar-btn" data-img-side="${side}">${IMG_ICON} Bild einfügen</button>
  1655|        Einfügen, Drag&Drop oder Klick
  1656|
`;
  1657|    return `
  1658|

  1659|
${cardId?'Karte bearbeiten':'Karte hinzufügen'}

  1660|

  1661|

  1662|

  1663|

Use offset=1663 to continue reading (showing 1643-1662 of 2678 lines)


Explanation:
Let me look more carefully at the vDecks function. The issue might be in the template literal. Let me check lines 1418-1420 more carefully. The template literal has nested template literals with `${...}` expressions. Let me look at the exact structure.

Line 1418: `${due  ? `${due} fällig` : ''}`
Line 1419: `${newN ? `${newN} neu` : ''}`
Line 1420: `${!due&&!newN ? `${(d.cards||[]).length} Karten` : ''}`

Wait - line 1418 has a nested backtick: `` `<span class="deck-count">...` `` - this is a template literal INSIDE a template literal. That's fine in JS as long as the inner backtick is properly closed. Let me check...

Line 1418: `${due  ? `${due} fällig` : ''}`

The inner template starts with `` ` `` after `?` and ends with `` ` `` before `: ''}`. That looks correct.

But wait - the outer template literal for the `cards` mapping starts at line 1413 with `` return ` `` and ends at line 1426 with `` `; ``. Inside that, we have nested template literals. This should be fine in modern JavaScript.

Let me look at the actual error. The user says "Decks werden nicht angezeigt" - the decks view is empty. This could be a JavaScript runtime error, not a syntax error. Let me check if there's something wrong with the `load()` function or the data.

Actually, let me look at the `newCard` function more carefully. The subagent added `priority: false` but the formatting might have broken something.

Let me re-read the newCard function area.


  1328|    };
  1329|  };
  1330|
  1331|    const newCard = (front, back) => ({
  1332|    id: uid(), front, back, created: Date.now(),
  1333|    state: 'new', interval: 0,
  1334|    stability: null, difficulty: null, lastReview: null,
  1335|    dueDate: null, lapses: 0, reviews: 0, learningStep: 0,
  1336|    /* legacy field, kept for backward read compat — unused by FSRS */
  1337|    easeFactor: 2.5,
  1338|    priority: false,
  1339|  });
  1340|
  1341|  /* ═══════════════════════════════════════
  1342|     STATE
  1343|

Use offset=1343 to continue reading (showing 1328-1342 of 2678 lines)


Explanation:
Let me look at the `newCard` function more carefully. The indentation is suspicious — line 1331 has 4 spaces of indent, but the surrounding code (line 1329 `};` and line 1341 `/* ═══`) seem to be at a different indentation level. Let me check what's around line 1328-1330 to understand the context.

Actually, looking at line 1328: `    };` and line 1329: `  };` — these are two closing braces at different indent levels. And then line 1331: `    const newCard = ...` with 4-space indent. This looks like `newCard` might have been accidentally indented inside some block it shouldn't be in.

Let me look at the broader context around this area to see if `newCard` got placed inside a function or block where it's not accessible globally.


  1310|          if (!am[3].trim()) { ta.setSelectionRange(ls, ls + indent.length + 3); document.execCommand('insertText', false, ''); }
  1311|          else document.execCommand('insertText', false, '\n' + indent + String.fromCharCode(am[2].charCodeAt(0) + 1) + '. ');
  1312|          return;
  1313|        }
  1314|      }
  1315|    });
  1316|  };
  1317|  const strip = h => { const d=document.createElement('div'); d.innerHTML=h; return d.textContent||''; };
  1318|
  1319|  const getDeck  = id => load().decks[id];
  1320|  const getCards = id => (getDeck(id)||{}).cards||[];
  1321|  const colorOf  = d  => d.color||COLORS[0];
  1322|
  1323|  const countsDue = (cards) => {
  1324|    const now = Date.now();
  1325|    return {
  1326|      due:   cards.filter(c => c.state!=='new' && c.dueDate && c.dueDate<=now).length,
  1327|      newN:  cards.filter(c => c.state==='new'||!c.state).length,
  1328|    };
  1329|  };
  1330|
  1331|    const newCard = (front, back) => ({
  1332|    id: uid(), front, back, created: Date.now(),
  1333|    state: 'new', interval: 0,
  1334|    stability: null, difficulty: null, lastReview: null,
  1335|    dueDate: null, lapses: 0, reviews: 0, learningStep: 0,
  1336|    /* legacy field, kept for backward read compat — unused by FSRS */
  1337|    easeFactor: 2.5,
  1338|    priority: false,
  1339|  });
  1340|

Use offset=1340 to continue reading (showing 1310-1339 of 2678 lines)


Explanation:
Let me look at the issue more carefully. The user says decks aren't showing. Let me check the browser console for errors. But first, let me look at the `newCard` function indentation — it looks like it has extra indentation (4 spaces instead of 2), which might indicate it was accidentally nested inside `countsDue`. Let me check the structure around lines 1329-1340.

Looking at lines 1323-1340:
```
  const countsDue = (cards) => {
    const now = Date.now();
    return {
      due:   cards.filter(c => c.state!=='new' && c.dueDate && c.dueDate<=now).length,
      newN:  cards.filter(c => c.state==='new'||!c.state).length,
    };
  };

    const newCard = (front, back) => ({
    id: uid(), front, back, created: Date.now(),
    ...
  });
```

The `newCard` has 4-space indentation while everything else has 2-space. This is suspicious. But more importantly, `newCard` is at the top level of the script — it's not inside `countsDue` because `countsDue` closed with `};` at line 1329. The extra indentation is just cosmetic.

Wait — the real issue might be something else. Let me check if there's a JavaScript error. The decks not showing could be because:
1. `load()` fails
2. `render()` fails
3. Some syntax error prevents the script from running

Let me look at the init code at the bottom of the file to see if it still calls `render()`.

Actually, let me check the very end of the file for the init code.


  2628|    clearInterval(apomo._iv); apomo._iv = null;
  2629|    apomo.state = state; apomo.accum = accum; apomo.startedAt = startedAt;
  2630|    apomo.remaining = Math.max(0, POMO_DUR - (accum + (startedAt ? Math.floor((Date.now() - startedAt) / 1000) : 0)));
  2631|    if (apomo.state === 'running') apomo._iv = setInterval(apomoTick, 500);
  2632|    apomoUpdateUI();
  2633|  };
  2634|
  2635|  if (_apomoCh) _apomoCh.onmessage = e => apomoApplyState(e.data);
  2636|
  2637|  document.getElementById('pomo-start').addEventListener('click', () => {
  2638|    if (apomo.state === 'running') {
  2639|      clearInterval(apomo._iv); apomo._iv = null;
  2640|      apomo.accum += Math.floor((Date.now() - apomo.startedAt) / 1000);
  2641|      apomo.startedAt = null; apomo.state = 'paused';
  2642|    } else {
  2643|      apomo.startedAt = Date.now(); apomo.state = 'running';
  2644|      apomo._iv = setInterval(apomoTick, 500);
  2645|    }
  2646|    apomoSave(); apomoBroadcast(); apomoUpdateUI();
  2647|  });
  2648|
  2649|  document.getElementById('pomo-stop').addEventListener('click', () => {
  2650|    if (apomo.state === 'idle') return;
  2651|    const elapsed = apomoElapsed();
  2652|    clearInterval(apomo._iv); apomo._iv = null;
  2653|    apomoRecord(elapsed);
  2654|    const mins = Math.round(elapsed / 60);
  2655|    apomo.state = 'idle'; apomo.remaining = POMO_DUR; apomo.accum = 0; apomo.startedAt = null;
  2656|    apomoSave(); apomoBroadcast(); apomoUpdateUI();
  2657|    if (mins >= 1) apomoToast(`⏱ ${mins} min erfasst`);
  2658|  });
  2659|
  2660|  // Init: gespeicherten State wiederherstellen
  2661|  (() => {
  2662|    try {
  2663|      const saved = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem(POMO_STORE) || 'null');
  2664|      if (saved && saved.state !== 'idle') apomoApplyState(saved);
  2665|      else apomoUpdateUI();
  2666|    } catch { apomoUpdateUI(); }
  2667|  })();
  2668|  </script>
  2669|<script>
  2670|/* ── PWA Service Worker registration ── */
  2671|if ('serviceWorker' in navigator) {
  2672|  window.addEventListener('load', function() {
  2673|    navigator.serviceWorker.register('/sw.js').catch(function(){});
  2674|  });
  2675|}
  2676|</script>
  2677|</body>
  2678|

Use offset=2678 to continue reading (showing 2628-2677 of 2678 lines)


Explanation:
Let me look at the issue more carefully. The user says decks aren't showing. Let me check the browser console for errors. The most likely issue is a JavaScript syntax error that prevents the entire script from executing. Let me look at the area around the `newCard` function — I noticed the indentation is off (line 1331 has extra indentation compared to surrounding code). But that shouldn't cause a JS error.

Let me check for more subtle issues. The `priorityToggleHtml` function uses a template literal with `${STAR_ICON}` — STAR_ICON is a template literal itself containing SVG. That should be fine.

Wait — let me look at the `vDecks` function more carefully. Line 1418-1419:

```
1418|            ${due  ? `<span class="deck-count"><span class="dot" style="background:#EF4444"></span>${due} fällig</span>` : ''}
1419|            ${newN ? `<span class="deck-count"><span class="dot" style="background:${c}"></span>${newN} neu</span>` : ''}
```

Line 1418 is MISSING the closing `: ''}` — it has `: ''}` but wait, let me re-read... Actually line 1418 ends with `` : ''} `` — that looks correct. But wait, line 1419 also looks correct.

Hmm, let me look at the original file vs the patched file. The subagent used `patch` tool extensively. Let me check if there's a syntax error by looking at the browser console output. Actually, I can't do that directly. Let me try to validate the JS more carefully.

Let me look at the `vDecks` function return statement more carefully. The template literal starts at line 1429 with `` return ` `` and ends at line 1440 with `` `; ``. Inside it, `${cards}` is at line 1438. The `cards` variable is defined at line 1411. This all looks correct.

Wait — I should check if there's an issue with the `newCard` function indentation. Line 1331 has `    const newCard = (front, back) => ({` with 4-space indent, but the surrounding code at line 1329 has `  };` with 2-space indent. This is just cosmetic though, not a syntax error.

Let me look more carefully at what the subagent might have broken. Let me check the area around the CSS additions — maybe a CSS syntax error is breaking the page rendering.

Actually, let me just try to open the file in a browser-like validation. Or better, let me check if there's a specific JS error by looking at the console. Since I can't open a browser, let me use node to parse the JS.

Wait, I can extract the JS and try to parse it with node's `--check` flag.

import re

with open('/media/HDD_1TB/Zeitgeist/anki.html') as f:
    html = f.read()

# Extract the main script block (the big one between <script> tags, not src=)
scripts = re.findall(r'<script>(.*?)</script>', html, re.DOTALL)
main_js = scripts[0]  # The first one is the main app code

# Write to temp file for node --check
with open('/tmp/anki_js_check.js', 'w') as f:
    f.write(main_js)

print(f"Extracted {len(main_js)} chars of JS")


Explanation:
Let me check the JavaScript for syntax errors. The user says decks aren't showing. Let me look more carefully at the code around the `newCard` function and the `vDecks` function. The indentation of `newCard` looks suspicious - it's indented with 4 spaces while surrounding code uses 2 spaces. Let me check if there's a syntax issue.

Actually, let me look at the broader context around line 1329-1340. The `countsDue` function ends at line 1329, then there's a blank line 1330, then `newCard` starts at 1331 with extra indentation. This could be a problem - `newCard` is indented as if it's inside `countsDue`, but it's not. In JavaScript, indentation doesn't matter for scope, but let me check if there's a missing closing brace or something.

Wait, let me look at the actual structure. Line 1323: `const countsDue = (cards) => {` - this opens a function. Line 1329: `};` - this closes it. Then line 1331: `    const newCard = ...` - this is at the top level of the script, which is fine. The indentation is just inconsistent.

Let me run node --check on the extracted JS to find the actual syntax error.

terminal

python3 /tmp/extract_js.py && node --check /tmp/anki_js_check.js 2>&1


Output:
Extracted 82805 chars of JS
/tmp/anki_js_check.js:1008

`) : `
Karte aufdecken, dann bewerten · Tasten 1–4 zum Bewerten
`}
                 ^

SyntaxError: Unexpected token ':'
    at wrapSafe (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1515:18)
    at checkSyntax (node:internal/main/check_syntax:78:3)

Node.js v22.12.0


Explanation:
The user says "Bei Anki werden mir abr meine Decks jetzt nicht angezeigt..." — the decks view is broken. I found a syntax error via `node --check` at line 1008 of the extracted JS. Let me look at what's around that area in the actual HTML file.

The error is: `Unexpected token ':'` at a line with `</div>`) : `<div style=...`

This looks like a ternary operator issue — probably a missing closing backtick or parenthesis. Let me find the exact location in the HTMLfile.

grep -n "Tasten 1–4 zum Bewerten" /media/HDD_1TB/Zeitgeist/anki.html


Output:
1805:
`) : `
Karte aufdecken, dann bewerten · Tasten 1–4 zum Bewerten
`}


Explanation:
Let me look at the context around line 1805 to understand the template literal structure. The error is at the `: ` after `</div>\`)`. This is a ternary operator inside a template literal. Let me trace the nesting.

The issue is likely in the vLearn function's template literal. Let me look at the full structure around that area.


1770|

  1771|

  1772|
  1773|        ${flipped ? (card.priority ? `
  1774|

  1775|          <button class="rating-btn rb-good" id="rate-gemerkt" title="Taste 3">
  1776|            Gemerkt!
  1777|            ${prev.good}
  1778|          </button>
  1779|
` : (learn.dojo ? `
  1780|

  1781|          <button class="rating-btn rb-again" id="dojo-nochmal">
  1782|            Nochmal
  1783|          </button>
  1784|          <button class="rating-btn rb-good" id="dojo-weiter">
  1785|            Weiter
  1786|          </button>
  1787|
` : `
  1788|

  1789|          <button class="rating-btn rb-again" data-rate="1" title="Taste 1">
  1790|            Nochmal
  1791|            ${prev.again}
  1792|          </button>
  1793|          <button class="rating-btn rb-hard" data-rate="2" title="Taste 2">
  1794|            Schwer
  1795|            ${prev.hard}
  1796|          </button>
  1797|          <button class="rating-btn rb-good" data-rate="3" title="Taste 3">
  1798|            Gut
  1799|            ${prev.good}
  1800|          </button>
  1801|          <button class="rating-btn rb-easy" data-rate="4" title="Taste 4">
  1802|            Einfach
  1803|            ${prev.easy}
  1804|          </button>
  1805|
`) : `
Karte aufdecken, dann bewerten · Tasten 1–4 zum Bewerten
`}
  1806|
`;
  1807|  };
  1808|
  1809|  /* ── VIEW: DONE ────────────────────────── */
  1810|  const vDone = () => {
  1811|    if (learn.dojo) {
  1812|      return `
  1813|

  1814|
⚔

  1815|
Dojo abgeschlossen!

  1816|
Alle Karten geübt.

  1817|

  1818|            <button class="btn btn-primary btn-lg" id="retry-btn">${IC.rotate} Nochmal</button>
  1819|            <button class="btn btn-ghost btn-lg" id="back-deck-btn">Zum Deck</button>
  1820|

  1821|
`;
  1822|    }
  1823|    const {stats={},total=0} = learn;
  1824|    const again=stats.again||0, hard=stats.hard||0, good=stats.good||0, easy=stats.easy||0;
  1825|    const correct=good+easy, tot=again+hard+good+easy;
  1826|    const pct = tot ? Math.round((correct/tot)*100) : 0;
  1827|    const emoji = pct===100?'🏆':pct>=70?'🎉':pct>=40?'💪':'📖';
  1828|    const msg   = pct===100?'Perfekt!':pct>=70?'Sehr gut!':pct>=40?'Weiter so!':'Noch üben!';
  1829|    return `
  1830|

Use offset=1830 to continue reading (showing 1770-1829 of 2678 lines)


Explanation:
Let me analyze the syntax error. Node.js says line 1008 in the extracted JS has `Unexpected token ':'`. The extracted JS is the main script block. Line 1008 in the extracted JS corresponds to line 1805 in the HTML.

Looking at line 1805:
```
        </div>`) : `<div style=\"font-size:12px;color:var(--text-3)\">Karte aufdecken, dann bewerten · Tasten 1–4 zum Bewerten</div>`}
```

This is the closing of a nested ternary expression. Let me trace the structure:

Line 1773: `${flipped ? (card.priority ? `...` : (learn.dojo ? `...` : `...`)) : `...`}`

So the structure is:
```
${flipped ?
  (card.priority ?
    `Gemerkt! button`
  :
    (learn.dojo ?
      `Dojo buttons`
    :
      `4 rating buttons`
    )
  )
:
  `Karte aufdecken...`
}
```

Wait, but the node error says line 1008 in the extracted JS. Let me count more carefully. The extracted JS starts from the first `<script>` tag after `shared.js`. Let me look at what line 1008 would be.

Actually, the issue might be that the nested ternary with template literals is confusing node's parser. But this is valid JavaScript - nested ternaries with template literals should work.

Wait, let me re-read line 1805 more carefully:
```
        </div>`) : `<div style=...
```

The `</div>`)` closes the template literal for the 4-button case, then ` : ` is the else branch of `learn.dojo ? ... : ...`, then another template literal starts.

But wait - the `</div>`)` - is that `</div>` followed by backtick-close-paren? Let me look at the context:

Line 1787: `        </div>` : ``
Line 1788-1804: the 4-button template
Line 1805: `        </div>`) : `<div style=...>`

So line 1805 has: `</div>`)` - that's closing the template literal (backtick), then closing paren for the `(learn.dojo ? ... : ...)` group, then ` : ` for the outer ternary else, then opening a new template literal.

Hmm, but the node error points to the `:` on that line. Let me think about what could cause `Unexpected token ':'`.

Actually wait - I need to look at the FULL expression. The issue might be that the ternary nesting is ambiguous. Let me trace:

```
${flipped ? (card.priority ? `...Gemerkt...` : (learn.dojo ? `...Dojo...` : `...4buttons...`)) : `...hint...`}
```

This should be valid. But maybe there's a missing closing paren somewhere?

Let me look at line 1779:
```
        </div>` : (learn.dojo ? `
```

So after the Gemerkt template closes with backtick, we have ` : (learn.dojo ? ` - this opens a paren for the inner ternary.

Line 1787:
```
        </div>` : `
```

This closes the Dojo template with backtick, then ` : ` for the inner ternary else, then opens the 4-button template.

Line 1805:
```
        </div>`) : `<div style=...>`
```

This closes the 4-button template with backtick, then `)` closes the paren from line 1779, then ` : ` for the outer ternary else, then opens the hint template.

Then line 1805 ends with `}` which closes the `${...}` expression.

This looks correct to me. Let me check if there's an issue with the extracted JS line numbering vs the HTML.

Actually, the node error says line 1008 in `/tmp/anki_js_check.js`. The extracted JS is 82805 chars. Let me look at what's around line 1008 in the extracted file.

Actually, I should just look at the extracted file directly.


1003|          </button>
  1004|          <button class="rating-btn rb-easy" data-rate="4" title="Taste 4">
  1005|            Einfach
  1006|            ${prev.easy}
  1007|          </button>
  1008|
`) : `
Karte aufdecken, dann bewerten · Tasten 1–4 zum Bewerten
`}
  1009|
`;
  1010|  };
  1011|
  1012|  /* ── VIEW: DONE ────────────────────────── */
  1013|

Use offset=1013 to continue reading (showing 1003-1012 of 1870 lines)


Found it, Boss. Syntax-Fehler in der nested ternary — eine fehlende schließende Klammer. Das zerschießt das gesamte JS-Parsing, deshalb rendern die Decks nicht.

Explanation:
Let me analyze the syntax error. The issue is on line 1805 of the HTML (line 1008 of the extracted JS):

```
        </div>`) : `<div style=\"font-size:12px;color:var(--text-3)\">Karte aufdecken, dann bewerten · Tasten 1–4 zum Bewerten</div>`}
```

The problem is the nested ternary expression. Let me trace the structure:

```javascript
${flipped ? (card.priority ? `...Gemerkt...` : (learn.dojo ? `...Dojo...` : `...4Buttons...`)) : `...hint...`}
```

Wait, let me look at the actual structure more carefully. The original code (before the priority change) was:

```javascript
${flipped ? (learn.dojo ? `...Dojo...` : `...4Buttons...`) : `...hint...`}
```

Now it's been changed to:

```javascript
${flipped ? (card.priority ? `...Gemerkt...` : (learn.dojo ? `...Dojo...` : `...4Buttons...`)) : `...hint...`}
```

But wait, looking at the actual code on lines 1773-1805:

```
1773|        ${flipped ? (card.priority ? `
1774|        <div class="rating-row">
1775|          <button class="rating-btn rb-good" id="rate-gemerkt" title="Taste 3">
1776|            <span class="rb-label">Gemerkt!</span>
1777|            <span class="rb-interval">${prev.good}</span>
1778|          </button>
1779|        </div>` : (learn.dojo ? `
1780|        <div class="rating-row">
...
1787|        </div>` : `
1788|        <div class="rating-row">
...
1804|          </button>
1805|        </div>`) : `<div style=...></div>`}
```

So the structure is:
```
${flipped ? (card.priority ? `...Gemerkt...` : (learn.dojo ? `...Dojo...` : `...4Buttons...`)) : `...hint...`}
```

Wait, line 1805 has `</div>`)` — that closes the 4-buttons template literal, then `)` closes `(learn.dojo ? ... : ...)`, but then there's `: <div...>` which is the else branch of `flipped ?`.

Actually wait, let me count the parentheses more carefully:

Line 1773: `${flipped ? (card.priority ?`
- This opens: `${` ... then `flipped ?` then `(card.priority ?`

The `(card.priority ?` opens a paren group. Then:
- `...Gemerkt...` (template literal)
- `:` (else of card.priority)
- `(learn.dojo ?` opens another paren group
- `...Dojo...` (template literal)
- `:` (else of learn.dojo)
- `...4Buttons...` (template literal)
- `)` closes `(learn.dojo ? ... : ...)`
- `)` closes `(card.priority ? ... : ...)`
- `:` (else of flipped)
- `...hint...` (template literal)
- `}` closes `${...}`

That looks correct! But node --check says there's a syntax error at the `:` on line 1008.

Wait, the issue might be that node --check is parsing the extracted JS differently. The extracted JS is just the raw script content without the HTML context. Let me look at what's around line 1008 in the extracted file.

Actually, the problem might be simpler. Let me look at the extracted JS around that area. The node error says:
```
/tmp/anki_js_check.js:1008
        </div>`) : `<div style=\"font-size:12px;color:var(--text-3)\">Karte aufdecken, dann bewerten · Tasten 1–4 zum Bewerten</div>`}
                 ^
SyntaxError: Unexpected token ':'
```

So node is seeing `</div>`) : ` and complaining about the `:`. This means the parser doesn't think this `:` is part of a ternary. That would happen if the preceding expression isn't being parsed as a valid ternary condition.

Let me trace back. The issue might be that the template literal before this isn't being closed properly, or there's some other syntax issue earlier that cascades.

Actually, I think I see the problem! Let me look at the extracted JS more carefully. The issue might be that the template literal containing the 4 buttons has an issue. Let me check if there's an unescaped backtick or something inside one of the template literals.

Wait, actually the real issue might be simpler. Let me look at the `newCard` function indentation:

```
1331|    const newCard = (front, back) => ({
```

This has 4-space indent while the surrounding code has 2-space indent. But that shouldn't cause a syntax error.

Let me think about what could cause the `:` to be unexpected. In JavaScript, `... ? ... : ...` is a ternary. If node sees `something) : something`, it would parse `something)` as a complete expression, then see `:` as unexpected. This would happen if the `?` part isn't properly connected.

Hmm, but the `?` is way back on line 1773. The issue might be that one of the nested template literals has a problem that causes the parser to lose track.

Actually, let me re-examine. The node error points to line 1008 in the extracted JS. Let me look at what's on lines 1000-1010 of the extracted JS to see the context.

I already read lines 1003-1012. Let me look a bit earlier, around line 990-1010.

Actually, I think the problem might be in the template literal for the 4 buttons. Let me check if there's something like an unescaped character or a backtick inside it.

Wait, I just realized — the issue might be that the `</div>`)` on line 1805 is being parsed as the end of a JavaScript expression, and then `: <div...>` is seen as a new statement starting with `:`, which is invalid. This would happen if the parser lost track of the ternary context.

Let me look at the full ternary chain more carefully. The structure is:

```javascript
${flipped ? (card.priority ? `A` : (learn.dojo ? `B` : `C`)) : `D`}
```

Where:
- A = Gemerkt template (lines 1774-1779)
- B = Dojo template (lines 1780-1787)
- C = 4Buttons template (lines 1788-1805)
- D = hint template (line 1805)

The `C` template ends with `</div>` on line 1805. Then `)` closes `(learn.dojo ? B : C)`. Then `)` closes `(card.priority ? A : (learn.dojo ? B : C))`. Then `:` is the else of `flipped ?`. Then `D`.

This should be syntactically valid. But node is complaining.

Hmm, let me check if there's an issue with the template literal `C` (the 4 buttons one). Maybe there's a backtick inside it that's not properly handled?

Looking at lines 1788-1805:
```
1788|        <div class="rating-row">
1789|          <button class="rating-btn rb-again" data-rate="1" title="Taste 1">
1790|            <span class="rb-label">Nochmal</span>
...
1804|          </button>
1805|        </div>`) : `<div style=...></div>`}
```

Wait, line 1805 has `</div>`)` — the backtick closes the template literal, then `)` closes the inner ternary. But the backtick is on line 1805 and it's followed by `)`. Let me check if the backtick is actually there.

Actually, I think the issue might be that the template literal `C` starts on line 1787 with `` : ` `` and ends on line 1805 with `` </div>` ``. But wait, line 1787 is:

```
1787|        </div>` : `
```

So line 1787 has `</div>` : ` — the first backtick closes the Dojo template (B), then `:` is the else of learn.dojo, then `` ` `` opens the 4Buttons template (C).

Then line 1805 has `</div>`) : ` — the backtick closes C, `)` closes the learn.dojo ternary, then `:` is... wait, that should be `))` not `)`.

Let me re-read line 1805:
```
1805|        </div>`) : `<div style=\"font-size:12px;color:var(--text-3)\">Karte aufdecken, dann bewerten · Tasten 1–4 zum Bewerten</div>`}
```

So it's: `</div>`) : `<div...>`}`

That's: backtick (closes C), `)` (closes learn.dojo ternary), `:` (else of card.priority ternary), backtick (opens D), `...hint...`, backtick (closes D), `}` (closes ${}).

But wait — we need TWO closing parens: one for `(learn.dojo ? ...)` and one for `(card.priority ? ...)`. Line 1805 only has ONE `)` before the `:`.

That's the bug! The `(card.priority ? ... : (learn.dojo ? ... : ...))` needs TWO closing parens at the end, but only one is present.

Let me verify by looking at the original structure:

Line 1773: `${flipped ? (card.priority ?`
- Opens `${`, then `flipped ?`, then `(card.priority ?` — that's 1 open paren for card.priority

Line 1779: `` </div>` : (learn.dojo ? ` ``
- Closes Gemerkt template, `:` else of card.priority, `(learn.dojo ?` — that's 1 open paren for learn.dojo

Line 1787: `` </div>` : ` ``
- Closes Dojo template, `:` else of learn.dojo, opens 4Buttons template

Line 1805: `` </div>`) : `<div...>`} ``
- Closes 4Buttons template, `)` closes learn.dojo paren, `:` else of card.priority... WAIT.

If `)` closes learn.dojo, then `:` should be the else of card.priority. But then we need ANOTHER `)` to close card.priority before the `:` for flipped's else.

Actually no. Let me re-trace:

```
${flipped ? (card.priority ? `A` : (learn.dojo ? `B` : `C`)) : `D`}
```

After `C` closes, we need: `)` (close learn.dojo), `)` (close card.priority), `:` (else of flipped), `D`, `}` (close ${}).

But line 1805 has: `` </div>`) : `<div...>`} ``

That's only ONE `)` before `:`. We're missing the second `)` that closes `(card.priority ? ...)`.

So the fix is to change line 1805 from:
```
        </div>`) : `<div style=...></div>`}
```
to:
```
        </div>`)) : `<div style=...></div>`}
```

That adds the missing closing paren for `(card.priority ? ...)`.

This is the syntax error that's breaking the entire JS parsing, which is why decks don't render.

patch

`) : `
Karte aufdecken, dann bewerten · Tasten 1–4 zum Bewerten
`}

`)) : `
Karte aufdecken, dann bewerten · Tasten 1–4 zum Bewerten
`}


Escape-drift detected: old_string and new_string contain the literal sequence '\\"' but the matched region of the file does not. This is almost always a tool-call serialization artifact where an apostrophe or quote got prefixed with a spurious backslash. Re-read the file with read_file and pass old_string/new_string without backslash-escaping '"' characters.

/media/HDD_1TB/Zeitgeist/anki.html was last read with offset/limit pagination (partial view). Re-read the whole file before overwriting it.


Explanation:
The patch failed due to escape drift. Let me re-read the exact line and use a simpler approach. The issue is line 1805 — the nested ternary is missing a closing parenthesis. Let me read the exact content and fix it.

The problematic line is:
```
        </div>`) : `<div style=\"font-size:12px;color:var(--text-3)\">Karte aufdecken, dann bewerten · Tasten 1–4 zum Bewerten</div>`}
```

The structure is:
```
${flipped ? (card.priority ? `...` : (learn.dojo ? `...` : `...`)) : `...`}
```

But the code has:
```
${flipped ? (card.priority ? `...` : (learn.dojo ? `...` : `...`) : `...`}
```

Missing a closing `)` after the 4-button template literal. The correct line should be:
```
        </div>`)) : `<div style=...>...</div>`}
```

Let me re-read the exact lines to get the precise content.


1804|          </button>
  1805|
`) : `
Karte aufdecken, dann bewerten · Tasten 1–4 zum Bewerten
`}
  1806|
`;
  1807|

Use offset=1807 to continue reading (showing 1804-1806 of 2678 lines)


Explanation:
Der Syntax-Fehler ist in Zeile 1805. Die nested ternary expression ist:

```
${flipped ? (card.priority ? `...` : (learn.dojo ? `...` : `...`)) : `...`}
```

Aber der Code hat:
```
${flipped ? (card.priority ? `...` : (learn.dojo ? `...` : `...`) : `...`}
```

Es fehlt eine schließende Klammer nach dem dritten Template-Literal (dem 4-Button-Fall). Die Struktur sollte sein:

```
${flipped ? (card.priority ? `...Gemerkt...` : (learn.dojo ? `...Dojo...` : `...4Buttons...`)) : `...Hint...`}
```

Aktuell:
```
${flipped ? (card.priority ? `...Gemerkt...` : (learn.dojo ? `...Dojo...` : `...4Buttons...`) : `...Hint...`}
```

Das Problem: Nach dem dritten `...` (4-Button-Template) fehlt `)` um die `(learn.dojo ? ... : ...)` zu schließen, und dann fehlt `)` um die `(card.priority ? ... : ...)` zu schließen.

Also Zeile 1805:
```
        </div>`) : `<div style=...></div>`}
```

Sollte sein:
```
        </div>`)) : `<div style=...></div>`}
```

Das `))` schließt sowohl `(learn.dojo ? ... : ...)` als auch `(card.priority ? ... : ...)`.

Ich muss die Zeile patchen.


--- a//media/HDD_1TB/Zeitgeist/anki.html
+++ b//media/HDD_1TB/Zeitgeist/anki.html
@@ -1802,7 +1802,7 @@
             Einfach
             ${prev.easy}
           </button>
-
`) : `
Karte aufdecken, dann bewerten · Tasten 1–4 zum Bewerten
`}
+
`)) : `
Karte aufdecken, dann bewerten · Tasten 1–4 zum Bewerten
`}

`;
   };

No linter for .html files


Explanation: The patch was applied. Now let me verify the fix by running node --checkagain.


terminal

Output: Extracted 82806 chars of JS


War ein Syntax-Fehler, Boss. In der nested ternary für die Rating-Buttons (Zeile 1805) fehlte eine schließende Klammer:

```js
// FALSCH:
</div>`) : `<div ...>...</div>`}

// RICHTIG:
</div>`)) : `<div ...>...</div>`}
```

`node --check` läuft jetzt sauber durch. Die Decks sollten wieder da sein — einmal `anki.html` neu laden.

Explanation: The fix worked — node --check passes now. The issue was a missing closing parenthesis in the nested ternary expression. Let me tell the user it's fixed.